Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Corruption Chronicles

U.S. Sen. Helps Hubby Get Big Govt. Deal

The Democrat senator who abruptly resigned as chair of a military construction committee after awarding her husband billions in government contracts has found another unethical way to enrich him.

California Senator Dianne Feinstein simply introduced legislation to keep the taxpayer dollars flowing into the family bank account after relinquishing power to annually distribute billions during six years as chair of the Senate’s Military Construction Appropriations subcommittee.

A Washington newspaper reports that the veteran lawmaker actually sponsored a law to route $25 billion to a government agency (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation—FDIC) that had just awarded one of her husband’s firms a lucrative contract to sell foreclosed properties at compensation rates higher than industry norms. 

Feinstein obviously intervened to help her wealthy investment banker hubby (Richard Blum) since she isn’t a member of the Senate committee that has jurisdiction over the FDIC and would normally not be involved in such matters. Furthermore, the FDIC is supposed to operate with funds from bank insurance payments and not direct federal infusions.  

Feinstein graciously offered to help the FDIC secure public funds to stem the rise of home foreclosures days before the agency awarded her husband’s real estate firm a lucrative contract to sell properties it had inherited from failed banks. Feinstein assures that there was no connection between the legislation and her husband’s sweet deal although it appears that there is. 

Senate ethics rules, which have become a bit of a joke in recent years, state that members must avoid conflicts of interest as well as even the appearance of a conflict of interest. When news broke a few years ago that Feinstein helped her spouse get billions in military construction deals (most of them non competitive bids) she denied playing any role in determining which companies actually got the contracts and assured that she never sought to influence the process in any way. 

Related

Judicial Watch Sues Fed for Grand Jury Subpoenas Tied to Testimony about $2.5 Billion…

Press Releases | April 02, 2026
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for failing...

Judicial Watch Uncovers FBI Records Showing FBI Objections to Planned Mar-a-Lago Raid

Press Releases | April 01, 2026
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has obtained 207 pages of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) records that reveal the FBI’s concerns about the legal bas...

Lawsuit against Evanston’s reparations program gets judge’s OK to move forward

In The News | April 01, 2026
From Crain’s Chicago Business: The 2024 lawsuit was filed by six people with hereditary ties to Evanston and by Judicial Watch, a conservative activist group. The suit claims...