Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Judicial Watch

Corruption Chronicles

Workers Who Use Fake Social Securities Can’t Be Fired

For the second time this week an appellate court has reversed a lower court decision to rule in favor of those who violate the nation’s immigration laws, this time making it illegal to fire undocumented workers who use fake Social Security numbers to get their job.

On the heels of an Idaho Supreme Court ruling that said an illegal immigrant can still be a legal resident entitled to free public medical care, a federal appellate court in California said that employees can’t be fired merely because they use fake Social Security numbers.

The case involves 48 Los Angeles janitors who submitted Social Security numbers that differed from the numbers on the government’s federal database. In other words, they used fake numbers to get a job they weren’t entitled to. The janitorial company, Aramark, gave the illegal workers three days to clear up the problem but only 15 did. The other 33 were fired.

A federal judge sided with Aramark but the janitors appealed to the Ninth U.S Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. The notoriously liberal court ordered Aramark to rehire the janitors with back pay, saying employees can’t be fired merely because the Social Security number they submit differs from the number on the government files.

In its decision, a three-judge panel wrote that a Social Security discrepancy “does not automatically mean that an employee is undocumented.” It also noted that federal law penalizes employers only if they knowingly employ illegal immigrants and that requires more evidence than a mismatch in the Social Security database, which the court said was not designed for immigration enforcement.

Issued days earlier, the Idaho ruling was equally bizarre. Although a state law prohibits giving public benefits to those who are not legal residents, the state’s Supreme Court ordered taxpayers in one county to pay for the costly medical care of an illegal immigrant because “the concept of residency does not distinguish between citizens and those who have entered this country illegally. “

The illegal immigrant from Mexico suffered a stroke in 2006 and racked up a $187,000 medical bill at a hospital located in the state’s largest county—Ada County—with a population of about 300,000. Unable to pay the exorbitant bill, the man applied for emergency medical indigent assistance from the county but was denied because of his legal status. A district court agreed with the county but hospital officials, desperate to get paid, appealed to the state Supreme Court and won.

Related

Judicial Watch Lawsuit: Did Democratic Arizona Attorney General Announce ‘Investigation’ of Trump to Sway…

Press Releases | April 17, 2025
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced an open records lawsuit revealing that Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes seems to have used her office for political purposes in threa...

NIH Funds Trans Professor’s App to Help People Sound Like Their Chosen Gender

Corruption Chronicles | April 17, 2025
Panicky media coverage of the Trump administration’s cuts to medical research grants warns it will threaten the nation’s place as a scientific leader and put millions of American l...

Public Pre-K-8 “Inclusivity” Books Push Gender Transitioning, Drag Queens, Preferred Pronouns

Corruption Chronicles | April 14, 2025
Leftwing activism has run amok in two Maryland public school districts with “inclusivity” books for elementary students that champion gender transitioning, drag queens and children...