About Us
Calendar
Staff Directory
Board of Directors
Legal Team
Career Opportunities
Contact
425 Third Street SW
Suite 800
Washington, DC 20024
Phone: 1-888-JW-Ethic
(1-888-593-8442)
Fax:
202-646-5199
Email:
info/at/judicialwatch.org
Our Projects
myJudicialWatch
Log In
Keep me logged in
|
I forgot my Password
Sign In
or
Judicial Watch® Because no one is above the law!
Home
Corruption Chronicles
Press Room
Press Releases
In the News
Publications
Press Images
Multimedia
Speaker Requests
The Docket
Investigative Bulletin
Make A Contribution
Home
•
The Docket
•
Appellate Court brief argu…
Top Stories
Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians”
End Illegal Immigration Now!
2012 Election Integrity Project
Challenging Obamacare
Gov. Agencies Meet with Hollywood RE: bin Laden
The Docket
Home
Current Litigation
Case Archive
Amicus Curiae
Case Quick Select
Alexander, et al. v. FBI (Nos. 96-2123/97-1288) – “Filegate”
Appellate Court brief arguing that non-purchase of health insurance does not count as an “activity” under the Commerce Clause
Appellate Court brief defending Georgia’s immigration law the Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of 2011 (IIREA)
Brentwood Road Postal Facility Anthrax Case
Brief challenging assertion of absolute immunity by Vice President
Brief in California State Supreme Court in Support of Law Banning “Same-Sex Marriage”
Brief in New York State Supreme Court Opposing Taxpayer-Funded Day Labor Site for Illegal Aliens
Brief in Support of Hazleton, Pennsylvania’s Illegal Immigration Enforcement Policies
Brief in Support of Mourners at Military Funerals
Brief in Support of Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003
Canyon County v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc
Chinagate
Consumer group seeking access to Medicare physician records
Doe v. Bin Laden, et al. (No. 01-2516) – 9/11 victims suit
Donato Dalrymple, et. al. v. United States of America
Dutton v. LA County Sheriff’s Department (No. 10-595) – Full Disclosure Network prisoner interview
Dutton v. Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, et al. (No. 10-595) – Full Disclosure Network prisoner interview
Family Research Council Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 11-1550)- defense of DOMA documents
Fonseca v. Fong (No. CPF-07-507227) – San Francisco sanctuary policy
Garcia v. City of Laguna Beach (No. 06-CC-10595) – day labor center
Gennifer Flowers v. James Carville, George Stephanopoulos and Little, Brown & Company
Hafiz v. ABC, Inc.
Howard B. Thompson, et. al. v. Li Ka-Shing, Gary K. Winnick, et. al.
In support of a local ordinance prohibiting street-side solicitation of day labor jobs
In support of California citizens’ rights to defend Proposition 8 when the state government does not
Jesse Lee Peterson v. Jesse Jackson, et. al.
John Doe v. al Baraka Investment and Development Corporation, et. al.
John Doe, et al., v. Maryland State Board of Elections
Johnson v. City of Houston (No. 10-20743) – Houston, TX sanctuary policies
Judicial Watch v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (No. 11-1797) – DOJ & ATF “Fast and Furious” documents
Judicial Watch v. Bureau of Land Management (No. 07-1570)
Judicial Watch v. Census Bureau (No. 09-0901)
Judicial Watch v. Central Intelligence Agency (No. 09-1303) – Reports on interrogation techniques from Office of former Vice President Cheney
Judicial Watch v. Central Intelligence Agency (No. 09-1352) – Records and documents relating to terrorist interrogation briefings of Nancy Pelosi and other members of Congress
Judicial Watch v. Chicago Police Department
Judicial Watch v. City of Phoenix (No. CV 10-52443) – records regarding Police Chief Jack Harris’ statements in USA v. Arizona
Judicial Watch v. City of Phoenix (No. CV 2010-015452) – mayor security detail information
Judicial Watch v. Colorado Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel (No. 2010 CV-8996) – OARC/ARC connection to investigations in Maricopa County, Arizona
Judicial Watch v. DC Metro Police Department
Judicial Watch v. Department of Commerce (No. 07-1446) – Investigating the Security & Prosperity Partnership
Judicial Watch v. Department of Commerce (No. 96-2747)
Judicial Watch v. Department of Commerce (No. 97-0289)
Judicial Watch v. Department of Commerce (No. 97-2416)
Judicial Watch v. Department of Defense (No. 08-1748)
Judicial Watch v. Department of Defense (No. 09-836) – Senator visits/briefings on the Republic of Georgia
Judicial Watch v. Department of Defense (No. 11-863) – Able Danger
Judicial Watch v. Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency (No. 11-890) – Osama bin Laden raid photographs and video recordings
Judicial Watch v. Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency (No. 12-0049)
Judicial Watch v. Department of Energy
Judicial Watch v. Department of Energy (No. 12-171)
Judicial Watch v. Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Agency (No. 10-246) – documents regarding climate “czar” Carol Browner
Judicial Watch v. Department of Health & Human Services (No. 08-1865)
Judicial Watch v. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 10-2328) – Obamacare waivers and McDonald’s
Judicial Watch v. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 10-443) – documents regarding closed-door meetings on health care reform
Judicial Watch v. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 11-002) – documents regarding Medicare review of Provenge
Judicial Watch v. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 11-608) – documents regarding creation of advertisements promoting Obamacare
Judicial Watch v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 04-0907) – alien crossings due to Bush Amnesty Program
Judicial Watch v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 07-0506) – Ramos & Compean
Judicial Watch v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 08-1723) – border fence records
Judicial Watch v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 08-2133)
Judicial Watch v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 09-150) – 2008 mexican border incursion reports
Judicial Watch v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 09-151) – records on cease & desist order for alien fugitive apprehensions
Judicial Watch v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 09-1799) – documents regarding changes to immigration policy 287(g).
Judicial Watch v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 10-2054) – documents regarding illegal immigrant charged with killing a nun in Virginia while driving drunk
Judicial Watch v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 10-301) – S Visas
Judicial Watch v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 11-604) – documents regarding reviews and dismissals of pending immigration cases
Judicial Watch v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 11-606) – documents regarding “deferred action” or “parole” regarding detained illegal aliens and “selective reprieve” for aliens with expired visas
Judicial Watch v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 11-725) – communications regarding the Virginia nun-killer case
Judicial Watch v. Department of Homeland Security (No. 11-804) – communications between USCIS and Congress regarding backdoor amnesty
Judicial Watch v. Department of Housing & Urban Development and Department of Justice (No. 12-0002)
Judicial Watch v. Department of Housing and Urban Development (No. 09-1811)
Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (10-1569) – DOJ communications with the ACLU regarding SB 1070 USA v. Arizona case
Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 06-0406) – Terrorist Surveillance Program
Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 08-1161) – T & U visas
Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 10-1606) – documents regarding meetings between Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perrelli and the White House regarding the DOJ’s case against the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense
Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 10-1783) – FOIA case for docs regarding DOJ directing funds to various organizations
Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 10-248) – documents regarding decision to try 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in New York
Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 10-851) – documents regarding dismissal of case U.S. v. New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense
Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 11-1497) – communications with Estelle Rogers
Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 11-1796) – DOJ & ATF “Fast and Furious” documents
Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 11-426) – documents regarding then-Solicitor General Elena Kagan’s role in drafting “Obamacare”
Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 11-500) – documents regarding communications between the DOJ and NAACP about U.S. v. New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense
Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 11-803) – communications concerning decision to not support DOMA
Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice – Pardongate
Judicial Watch v. Department of Labor (No. 09-1852) – Investigation of alleged embezzlement involving ACORN
Judicial Watch v. Department of Labor (No. 10-1567) – documents regarding the We Can Help program to pay illegal immigrants a “rightful wage”
Judicial Watch v. Department of State (No. 08-1011)
Judicial Watch v. Department of State (No. 10-1731) – documents regarding government sponsored trips taken by Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf
Judicial Watch v. Department of the Army
Judicial Watch v. Department of the Treasury (No. 09-1427) – Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailout documents
Judicial Watch v. Department of the Treasury (No. 09-1508) – TARP evaluation process and Barney Frank and OneUnited Bank documents
Judicial Watch v. Department of the Treasury (No. 09-152)
Judicial Watch v. Department of the Treasury (No. 09-2132) – Sept. 18, 2008 bailout briefing held by Ben Bernanke and Henry Paulson
Judicial Watch v. Department of the Treasury (No. 10-302) – AIG TARP documents
Judicial Watch v. Department of the Treasury (No. 10-72) – records of sale of former GM plant in Wilmington, Delaware
Judicial Watch v. Dept of the Interior and Dept of the Treasury (No. 12-170)
Judicial Watch v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (No.06-1135)
Judicial Watch v. Federal Communications Commission (No. 09-1481) – Digital television transition delay documents
Judicial Watch v. Federal Housing Finance Agency (No. 09-1537) – documents regarding the decision to place Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into “conservatorship”
Judicial Watch v. Federal Reserve (No. 09-2138) – visitor logs for meetings with Ben Bernanke and Kevin Warsh
Judicial Watch v. Food and Drug Administration
Judicial Watch v. Food and Drug Administration (No. 00-2973)
Judicial Watch v. Food and Drug Administration (No. 07-1776) – Gardasil
Judicial Watch v. LA County Board of Supervisors (No. BC-447137) – documents regarding meetings held in Washington, DC May 5-6, 2010
Judicial Watch v. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (No. 09-837) – NASA transition documents
Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration (No. 07-1267)
Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration (No. 07-1987) – Hillary Clinton’s Healthcare Task Force
Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration (No. 10-1834) – Clinton Presidential tapes
Judicial Watch v. National Energy Policy Development Group, et al.
Judicial Watch v. National Labor Relations Board (No. 11-1476) – documents regarding lawsuit against Boeing’s South Carolina plant plan
Judicial Watch v. Office of Governor Rod R. Blagojevich (No. 07-CH-1306)
Judicial Watch v. Office of the Attorney General
Judicial Watch v. Office of the Mayor of Chicago, et al. (No. 09-CH-44990) – documents regarding White House involvement in Chicago Olympic bid
Judicial Watch v. Pasadena Police Department (No. GC-045609) – documents regarding PPD’s illegal alien policies
Judicial Watch v. Social Security Administration (No. 06-2034) – “no match” letter statistics
Judicial Watch v. the Corporation for National and Community Service (No. 09-1854)
Judicial Watch v. the Federal Bureau of Investigation (No. 10-1568) – documents regarding the late Senator Ted Stevens
Judicial Watch v. the Federal Bureau of Investigation (No. 10-593) – John Murtha PMA Group documents
Judicial Watch v. the Federal Bureau of Investigation (No. 10-71) – involvement in the release of convicted Pan-Am Flight 103 bomber
Judicial Watch v. the Federal Bureau of Investigation (No. 10-963) – documents regarding the late Senator Ted Kennedy
Judicial Watch v. The Office of the Mayor of New York City (No. 115225-10) – contact between the mayor’s office and controversial Muslim organizations regarding the Ground Zero Mosque
Judicial Watch v. The United States Senate
Judicial Watch v. U.S. Air Force (No. 11-1496) – Michelle Obama’s family trip to Africa
Judicial Watch v. U.S. Air Force (No. 11-349) – Harry Reid travel documents
Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Defense
Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 11-1497)
Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 12-277)
Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Transportation (No. 12-324)
Judicial Watch v. U.S. Secret Service (No. 09-2312) – White House visitor logs
Judicial Watch v. United States Secret Service (No. 06-0310)
Judicial Watch v. US Navy (No. 12-172)
Judicial Watch v. Vermont, Howard Dean, et al.
Malone, et al. v. Phoenix Police Pension Board, et al. – Illegal pension payments to Phoenix Police Chief
McKinley v. FDIC (No. 10-420) – records regarding FDIC bailout of Citigroup and Bank of America
McKinley v. FDIC and Federal Reserve (No. 09-1263) – records regarding FDIC approval of Wachovia takeover and Federal Reserve approval of Bear Stearns bailout
McKinley v. Federal Housing Finance Agency (No. 10-1165) – documents regarding the decision to place Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into “conservatorship”
McKinley v. Federal Reserve (No. 10-751) – records regarding AIG and Lehman Brothers bailouts
Moreno v. Bratton (No. BS-108317) – Los Angeles state notification
Notra Trulock, III v. Department of Justice, et. al.
Packer v. US Commission On Security & Cooperation in Europe, and Alcee Hastings and Fred Turner (No. 11-00485 D.D.C.)
Philips, et al. v Board of Trustees of Montgomery College (No. V342882) – - taxpayer supported funding for illegal aliens to attend Montgomery College
Robert Lake v. Providian Financial Corporation, Larry D. Thompson et. al.
Rodearmel v. Clinton (No. 09-171) – Hillary Clinton is constitutionally ineligible to serve as Secretary of State due to the “emoluments” clause
Staudenraus v. Spitzer
Sturgeon v. Bratton (No. BC-351646) – Special Order 40
Sturgeon v. Los Angeles County (No. BC-351286) – Judge pay
Tiffany Hartley v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (No. 11-1701)
Tiffany Hartley v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 11-1698)
Tiffany Hartley v. U.S. Department of State (No. 11-1700)
U.S. Supreme Court brief on behalf of Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce supporting Arizona’s “Legal Arizona Workers Act”
U.S. Supreme Court brief on FEC violation of the First Amendment
US Supreme Court brief supporting Arizona’s petition for review of the lawsuit against SB 1070
USA v. The State of Arizona (No. 10-cv-01413-SRB) – intervening on behalf of State Senator Russell Pearce in defense of SB 1070
Vincent v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al. (No. 03-226)
Wright v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Wright v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al. (No. 02-915)
Wurzelbacher v. Jones-Kelley, et al. (No. 2:07-cv-162) – “Joe the Plumber” civil rights violation
Yordanis Montoya Isaac v. The Republic of Cuba
Print
Text
Size
Tweet
Appellate Court brief arguing that non-purchase of health insurance does not count as an “activity” under the Commerce Clause
Last Updated: December 15, 2011
Synopsis
Official Legal Documents
Amicus Curiae
Get our email newsletter
Enter your email address
*
May 25, 2012
the Brief
1
Weekly Update:
Suing the Courts
2
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton’s CPAC Speech
Presented at the Ronald Reagan Banquet
3
Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicans”
2011
4
Full Disclosure Network
CA Paying Judges
5
CONSERVATIVE ACTION PROJECT
Obama “Recess” appointments Unwarranted, Unnecessary and Unconstitutional
6
Fight Corruption Now
7
The International Program
Public Education
8
Illegal Immigration
Get caught up with this project
9
Solyndra
JW sues for records
10
Open Records Resources
Stay Connected
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
Scribd.
Inbox
Flickr
