Skip to content

Judicial Watch • JW v. State Clinton iPad iPhone 00646

JW v. State Clinton iPad iPhone 00646

JW v. State Clinton iPad iPhone 00646

Page 1: JW v. State Clinton iPad iPhone 00646

Category:

Number of Pages:9

Date Created:December 17, 2015

Date Uploaded to the Library:December 17, 2015

Tags:Judic, Reviewer, iPhone, iPad, 00646, NIELSEN, authority, senior, release, Barbara, Patrick, review, Mills, Donald, security, unclassified, clinton, FOIA, department


File Scanned for Malware

Donate now to keep these documents public!

  • demand_answers

See Generated Text   ˅

Autogenerated text from PDF

United States Department State
Washington, D.C. 20520
OCT 12015
Case No. F-2015-05028
Segment: DS-0001 part
Kate Bailey
Judicial Watch
425 Third Street, SW, Suite 800
Washington, 20024
Dear Ms. Bailey: refer our letter dated August 20, 2015, regarding the release certain
Department State records under the Freedom Information Act (the FOIA), u.s.c. 552.
The search the records the Bureau Diplomatic Security ongoing.
have identified documents that are responsive your request. After reviewing
these documents, have determined that five must withheld part, one must withheld full and eight require consultation with other U.S. Government
agencies. have referred the latter eight documents the relevant agencies,
with request advise the Department State any impediments release expeditiously possible. All released material enclosed. enclosure explains the FOIA exemptions and other grounds for withholding
material. Where have made excisions, the applicable FOIA exemptions are
marked each document. some cases, two more exemptions may apply
the same document. For the one document withheld full, have cited the
following FOIA exemptions: U.S.C. 552 (b)(l), (b)(5) and (b)(7)(C). will keep you informed your case progresses. you have any questions,
your attorney may contact Marsha Edney, Trial Attorney, (202) 514-4520
Marsha.Edney@usdoj.gov. Please refer the case number, F-2015-05028, and
the civil action number, 15-cv-00646, all correspondence about this case.
Since11/~
fur
John Hackett, Director
Offic(. Information Programs and Services
Enclosures: stated Frettdnm Jnfonnation Act USC 552)
FOIA Exemptions )(l)
Information specifically authorized executive order kept secret the interest national defense foreign policy. Executive Order 13526 includes the following
classification categories: .4(a) military plans, systems, operations; .4(b) foreign government information; .4(c) intelligence activities, sources methods, cryptology;
J.4( foreirn relations foreign activities oftbc US, including confidential sources; .4(e) scientific, technological, economic matters relating national security,
including defense against transnational terrorism;
1.4(t) U.S. Government programs for safeguarding nuclear materials facilities; .4(g) vulnerabilities capabilities systems, installations, infrastructures, projects,
plans, protection services relating national security, including defense
against transnational terrorism; .4(h) weapons mass destruction;
(b)(2)
Related solely the internal personnel rules and practices agency
(b)(3)
Specifically exempted from dis cfosu statute (other than USC 552), for example:
ARMEX
Arms Export Control Act, USC 2778(e)
EXPORT Export Administration Act 1979, App. USC 2411 (c)(l)
FSA
INA
IRA.N
Foreign Seniice Act 1980, USC 4003 4004
Immigration and Nationality Act, USC 1202(
Iran Claims Settlement Act, Sec. 505, USC 1701, note
(b)(4)
Trade secrets and confidential commercial financial information
(b)(5)
lnteragency intra-agency communications forming part the deliberative process,
attorney-client privilege, attorney work product
(b)(6)
Personal privacy infornrntion
(b)(7)
Law enforcement infonnation whose disclosure would:
(A) interfere with enforcement proceedings
(B) deprive person fair trial
(C) constitute unwan-aJlted invasion personal privacy
(D) disclose confidential sources
(E) disclose investigation techniques
(F) endanger life physical safety individual
Other Grounds for Withholding
Material not responsive FOIA request excised with the agreement. the requester
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department State .Case F-?0 050?8
5oc
-06ta1neaoy Judic1a 1Wac Wal 0iJ7:
nc.
No. C05838718 Date: 10/01/2015
DS018
RELEASE PART
B5,B7(C)
Reid, Donald
REVIEW AUTHORITY: Barbara Nielsen, Senior
Reviewer
From:
Sent:
To:
87(C)
Subject: this what Pat asked for..
87(C)
From:
Sent: h-.o~....,.,~
To:
87(C)
Cc: L-~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
Subject: Draft Memo from Mills
Importance: High
Attached the draft memo Ive
you see fit Ive listed
you think
its. clearances, but
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department State Case No. F-2015-05028 Doc No. C05838718 Date: 10/01/2015
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department State Case No. F-2015-05028 Doc No. C05838719 Date: 10/01/2015
DS019
REVIEW
AUTHORITY:
Barbara
RELEASE PART
Nielsen,
Reid Donald
B7(C
--------------------------------------------- senior ____....,__._.__...,....,..-.,_.__________,
Reviewer
Reid, Donald
From:
Sent:
To:
Tuesda February 2009 6:45
Donova Patrick
Cc:
Subject:
B7(C)
tj/(~)
e:ivremo :>Mirr fine with this memo ...
B7(C)
From:
Sent: ..,.u =ay~~rua 24, 2009 6:14
To: Reid Donald Donovan Patrick
B7(C)
Cc: ectfFWf Memo S=Mil!S (2).ooc
Importa11e2: High
r1Jweaktld the draft memo per your instructions hadD
review and tweaked further. Before send toi
L__Jor clearance need confirmation that this What wanted. Thanks.
B7(C)
B7(C)
From:
B7(C~
To:
SUbject: Memo S-Mllls (2).doc
B7(Cr
-~-----~---- 24, 2009 4:41
sent:
ruary
~------