Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Corruption Chronicles

Democrats To Block Federal Election Commission Nominee

Top Democrats have threatened to block an election commission (FEC) nominee because they claim minorities were hurt by legislation he endorsed to combat voter fraud as a Justice Department attorney.

Leading the chorus of opposition is California Senator Dianne Feinstein, the Rules Committee Chairwoman, who says it’s a “real problem” that the president’s Federal Election Commission nominee (Hans von Spakovsky) didn’t protect minority voters as a government attorney.

Von Spakovsky’s crime, in the eyes of Feinstein and co., was supporting legislation to eliminate rampant voter fraud in Georgia where he served as senior counsel in the Justice Department’s civil rights division. Struck down last year by a Jimmy Carter-appointed federal judge, the law simply required voters to provide an official government-issued identification at the polls to assure the identity of the person voting.

Triumphant civil rights groups such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) argued that requiring identification amounted to a poll tax that would prevent minorities and the poor from voting because they may not be able to afford the fee to obtain one. Georgia actually offers free photo identification cards for citizens without driver’s licenses.

Democrats and civil rights advocates claim that Spakovsky actually made it harder for Americans to vote during his tenure at the Department of Justice and therefore should not serve on the FEC. One group even accused him of doing everything in his power to minimize the vote, particularly of minorities and Democrats.

Georgia is not alone in its effort to eliminate election fraud, however. Many states require citizens to present a valid identification before voting and liberal judges across the nation have struck down recently passed voter ID laws in a number of states, including Missouri, Ohio and Arizona. The rulings mostly claim that requiring voters to present identification disenfranchises racial minorities.

Judicial Watch is a non-partisan, educational foundation dedicated to fighting government and judicial corruption and promoting a return to ethics and morality in our nation’s public life. To view the Judicial Watch Internet site click here (www.judicialwatch.org).

Related

Judicial Watch Sues Fed for Grand Jury Subpoenas Tied to Testimony about $2.5 Billion…

Press Releases | April 02, 2026
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for failing...

Judicial Watch Uncovers FBI Records Showing FBI Objections to Planned Mar-a-Lago Raid

Press Releases | April 01, 2026
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has obtained 207 pages of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) records that reveal the FBI’s concerns about the legal bas...

Lawsuit against Evanston’s reparations program gets judge’s OK to move forward

In The News | April 01, 2026
From Crain’s Chicago Business: The 2024 lawsuit was filed by six people with hereditary ties to Evanston and by Judicial Watch, a conservative activist group. The suit claims...