Follow Us

Menu

About Read Now Watch Now Listen Now Act Now Press Room Document Archives SMS Sign Up

Menu

Read Now Watch Now Listen Now About Donate Press Room Document Archives Act Now SMS Sign Up

More

Amicus Briefs Financial Disclosures Open Records Laws and Resources

Follow Us

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Donate
Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions User Agreement RSS Feed

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate
Twitter Facebook Youtube Instagram Truth
New Election Integrity Map!

Donate
Judicial Watch

Donate

| March 29, 2016

JW v State summary judgment motion 01242

JW v State summary judgment motion 01242

© 2025 Judicial Watch, Inc.

Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and corporations and are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.

Shop Donate

Top News


book

FBI



election map



Related

Tom Fitton's Judicial Watch Weekly Update

Supreme Court Victory!

Tom Fitton's Judicial Watch Weekly Update | May 01, 2026
JW v State summary judgment motion 01242 Supreme Court Blocks Race-Based Gerrymandering Court Victory: D.C. Blocked from Hiding January 6 Bodycam Footage Oregon Settlement Targets ...
Press Releases

Judicial Watch Victory: Court Rejects D.C. Bid to Hide January 6 Bodycam Footage

Press Releases | May 01, 2026
JW v State summary judgment motion 01242 (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that a Washington, D.C. court ruled that Washington D.C.’s Metropolitan Police Department...
In The News

Court rules Arizona AG Kris Mayes illegally withheld information

In The News | May 01, 2026
JW v State summary judgment motion 01242 From Tucson.com: PHOENIX — Attorney General Kris Mayes acted illegally in withholding some information about communications her office had...