Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Corruption Chronicles

Court Lets N.J. Gov. Hide Emails

A New Jersey Appellate Court has reversed a judge’s decision ordering the governor to disclose electronic mail exchanges with his labor union leader girlfriend while they were on opposing sides of state worker contract negotiations. 

A Superior Court judge had previously ordered Governor Jon Corzine to make public hundreds of pages of emails exchanged with girlfriend Carla Katz, president of the largest union representing state workers (Communications Workers of America Local 1034), because both parties were heavily involved in public negotiations at the time.

For more than a year, the Democrat governor refused to disclose the files claiming that they are protected under privileges of his office. Last June, Superior Court Judge Paul Innes ordered Corzine to release the emails because the public has the right to know whether the relationship had any “improper influence on the governor’s paramount obligation to serve the interest of the citizens of New Jersey first.” 

Corzine quickly appealed and this week a three-judge New Jersey Appellate Court panel reversed that order, claiming that the emails are in fact covered under executive privilege. In a 37-page decision, the court said that the governor properly asserted executive privilege. 

“The release of confidential e-mails may have a chilling effect on the governor’s ability or willingness to solicit advice, or accept unsolicited advice in the future,” according to the ruling, which goes on to say that the governor “must be accorded a qualified power to protect the confidentiality of communication pertaining to the executive function.”  

Never mind the obvious conflict created by the romantic relationship of the two key players in a massive state contract negotiation. Clearly, it could have tainted the process and taxpayers certainly have the right to know. 

Related

Colorado Removes 372,000 Inactive Voters from its Rolls after Lawsuit

Judicial Watch Sues for Search Warrants in Rudy Giuliani Raid Colorado Removes 372,000 Inactive Voters from its Rolls after Lawsuit Judicial Watch Election Integrity Team to Monito...

Judicial Watch Election Integrity Team to Monitor Hungary’s Elections

Press Releases | April 09, 2026
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that an eight-member election-integrity team will monitor the April 12 Hungarian parliamentary elections. The vote will determine ...

Judicial Watch: 372,000 Inactive Voters Removed from Colorado Voter Rolls after Lawsuit and Settlement

Press Releases | April 08, 2026
Six Million Inactive Names Removed Nationwide Due to Judicial Watch (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that 372,000 ineligible voter names have been removed from Col...